Taking Generation as Abduction Seriously
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper introduces 'assumptions', one-sided mutual beliefs, to construct a bidirectional architecture incorporating Hobbs et al.'s abduction. The integration of deductive parsing and abductive semantic interpretation may provide a basis for a bidirectional architecture. However, the idea of cost, the principal mechanism in Hobbs et al.'s abduction, is not workable for generation because it simply amounts to the assumability of parts of logical forms for the purpose of interpretation. We introduce explicit `assumptions' attached to particular expressions so as not only to control generation, but also to lighten the burden of abduction. This paper also discusses implementation issues on the data structure and the generation algorithm.
منابع مشابه
Life Expectancy Changes for Each Subway Station: Taking Social Determinants of Health Seriously More Than Ever
Life Expectancy Changes for Each Subway Station: Taking Social Determinants of Health Seriously More Than Ever Reza Esmaeili 1* 1Assistance Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran Abstract Nowadays, health inequalities are emerging at short geographic distances, even ...
متن کاملCommentary: Exploratory data analysis
Despite the importance of exploratory data analysis (EDA) in statistics and science, few people have worked on its philosophical foundations. In psychology, the present author (Haig, 2012; Behrens et al., 2013) have commented on philosophical aspects of EDA. They hold contrasting views about the appropriateness of abductive reasoning as a core component of the philosophy of EDA. Behrens and his...
متن کاملOn the Duality of Abduction and Model Generation
We present a duality relationship between abduction for deenite abductive programs and model generation on the only-if part of these programs. As was pointed out by Console et all, abductive solutions for an abductive program correspond to models of the only-if part. We extend this observation by showing that the procedural semantics of abduction itself can be interpreted dually as a form of mo...
متن کاملInverting Conditional Opinions in Subjective Logic
Subjective Logic has operators for conditional deduction and conditional abduction where subjective opinions are input arguments. With these operators traditional Bayesian reasoning can be generalised from taking only probabilistic arguments to also taking opinions as arguments, thereby allowing Bayesian modeling of situations affected by uncertainty and incomplete information. Conditional dedu...
متن کاملAbduction through Semantic Tableaux versus Abduction through Goal-Directed Proofs∗
Very few philosophers of science will object to the idea that abduction plays a key role in scientific reasoning. Still, the logical foundations of abduction have been seriously neglected, both by logicians and philosophers of science. For centuries, the former have discarded abduction as a fallacy (“affirming the consequent”), about which nothing ‘decent’ can be said. The latter are usually mo...
متن کامل